LNAT Practice Test Essay – Under what circumstances is civil disobedience morally justifiable?

In the LawMint LNAT Practice Test Series for 2024 and 2025, there are 30 full length tests, with 360 passages – 1260 MCQs and 90 essay prompts or essay questions.

The essay below is a sample that can be written for the prompt:

Under what circumstances is civil disobedience morally justifiable?

This LNAT essay question is included in LawMint LNAT Practice Test series.

While the model essays may include both sides of an argument, the question may require you to state your stance - either for or against; and support it with arguments.

Read our articles and watch the videos on our YouTube channel for guidance on how to structure and write the LNAT Essay.

Introduction

Civil disobedience refers to the deliberate and nonviolent violation of laws or resistance to government policies by citizens in a bid to effect social or political change. Acts of civil disobedience can range from protests and demonstrations to more dramatic actions like refusing to pay taxes or defying government orders. Historically, civil disobedience has played a crucial role in advocating for the rights and freedoms of marginalized groups. However, the question remains: under what circumstances is civil disobedience morally justifiable? This essay will analyze the moral justification of civil disobedience under various circumstances, including when the law is unjust, when the government is unresponsive, and when there is a need for social or political change.

Unjust Laws

First and foremost, civil disobedience is morally justifiable when the laws in question are unjust or discriminatory. This principle was famously articulated by Martin Luther King Jr. in his Letter from Birmingham Jail, where he stated that an individual has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. Unjust laws are those that violate the basic principles of human rights and equality, such as laws that promote racial or gender discrimination, or those that deny individuals the right to freedom of expression, religion, or assembly. In these cases, civil disobedience becomes a necessary tool for exposing the injustices perpetrated by the government and advocating for the rights of the oppressed.

Unresponsive Government

Another circumstance under which civil disobedience is morally justifiable is when the government is unresponsive to the needs and demands of its citizens. In some cases, the political system may be rigged, rendering conventional channels of political participation ineffective or inaccessible. When peaceful attempts to engage with the government fail, and when the interests of the majority are consistently sidelined or ignored, civil disobedience can serve as a powerful means of raising awareness, galvanizing public opinion, and pressuring the government to respond. In this context, civil disobedience is morally justifiable as it provides marginalized and disenfranchised citizens with a platform to voice their grievances and demand change.

Need for Social or Political Change

Civil disobedience may also be morally justifiable in situations where there is a pressing need for social or political change. This can be observed in cases where the status quo perpetuates systemic inequalities or where the government’s actions are causing significant harm to the environment or public welfare. In such situations, acts of civil disobedience can serve as catalysts for change, raising public awareness and inspiring collective action. For instance, the Civil Rights Movement in the United States and the Indian Independence Movement led by Mahatma Gandhi are examples of how civil disobedience was employed to challenge prevailing social and political norms and bring about transformative change.

Caveats and Conclusion

It is important to note that not all acts of civil disobedience are morally justifiable. For civil disobedience to be morally justified, it must adhere to certain principles. Firstly, the act must be nonviolent, aimed at minimizing harm to others and ensuring that the focus remains on the issue at hand. Secondly, the act must be deliberate and well-reasoned, with the intention of addressing a specific injustice or promoting a particular cause. Finally, those engaging in civil disobedience must be prepared to face the legal consequences of their actions, demonstrating their commitment to the cause and the principles they seek to uphold.

In conclusion, civil disobedience can be morally justifiable under specific circumstances, such as when laws are unjust, when the government is unresponsive to the needs of its citizens, or when there is a pressing need for social or political change. However, for civil disobedience to be morally justified, it must adhere to the principles of nonviolence, intentionality, and a willingness to accept the consequences of one’s actions. In essence, civil disobedience is not merely a tool for rebellion or disruption, but a carefully considered means of promoting justice, equality, and social progress.

In a world where power dynamics can be skewed and marginalized communities struggle to have their voices heard, civil disobedience remains a vital instrument for change. While it may not always guarantee immediate results, history has shown that it can be a powerful force in challenging the status quo and advocating for a more just and equitable society. The key lies in ensuring that civil disobedience is employed responsibly, strategically, and with a clear moral compass guiding its use. In doing so, civil disobedience can be a catalyst for meaningful change and a testament to the power of individuals to shape the course of history.