- Revised LNAT 2026 Edition: Fully updated material.
- 200 Full-Length Practice Tests.
- 8,400 Multiple-Choice Questions: Extensive question bank.
- 90 Essay Questions: Includes model answers for guidance.
- 100 Level 1 Tests : Build confidence and baseline scores.
- 100 Level 2 Tests : More verbose and challenging.
- Detailed Explanations for every answer.
- Enhanced Practice: Retake all tests up to two times.
- Answer Shuffling: Randomized for better practice.
- Access Duration: 6 months from the date of purchase.
- Value: Affordable, student-friendly pricing.
- Try two free full length practice tests before you buy.
In the LawMint LNAT Practice Test Series for 2025 and 2026, there are 30 full length tests, with 360 passages – 1260 MCQs and 90 essay prompts or essay questions.
The essay below is a sample that can be written for the prompt:
Should the death penalty be abolished? Discuss the moral and practical arguments.
Introduction
The death penalty, or capital punishment, has been a subject of debate and controversy for centuries. Proponents argue that it serves as a deterrent to crime and delivers justice for victims, while opponents contend that it is morally wrong and has numerous practical issues. This essay will discuss the moral and practical arguments surrounding the death penalty and whether it should be abolished.
Moral Arguments Against the Death Penalty
One of the primary moral arguments against the death penalty is the sanctity of human life. Many believe that taking a human life, even in response to a heinous crime, is morally wrong and contrary to the fundamental right to life. Critics argue that the death penalty reinforces the idea of a cycle of violence and does not uphold the values of a humane society.
Another moral argument against the death penalty is the potential for wrongful convictions. As the death penalty is an irreversible punishment, any miscarriage of justice resulting in the execution of an innocent person is a grave moral concern. While legal systems strive to minimize the risk of wrongful convictions, human error and flaws in the justice system can still lead to tragic mistakes.
Practical Arguments Against the Death Penalty
There are several practical arguments against the death penalty, with one of the most significant being its questionable effectiveness as a deterrent to crime. Numerous studies have found little to no evidence that the death penalty reduces crime rates more effectively than other forms of punishment, such as life imprisonment. In some cases, research has even shown that states or countries with the death penalty have higher murder rates than those without it.
The cost of implementing the death penalty is another practical concern. Capital cases often require extensive legal resources, specialized attorneys, and lengthy appeals processes, making them considerably more expensive than non-capital cases. These financial burdens can strain government budgets and divert resources from other essential public services, such as education and healthcare.
Additionally, the death penalty can prolong the suffering of victims’ families. The lengthy legal processes and appeals associated with capital cases can force families to relive their trauma repeatedly, delaying their ability to find closure and heal.
Arguments in Favor of the Death Penalty
Supporters of the death penalty often argue that it is a just punishment for the most heinous crimes, such as murder and terrorism. They believe that the severity of the punishment should be proportionate to the gravity of the offense and that the death penalty serves as a form of retribution for the victims and their families.
Another argument in favor of the death penalty is the belief that it can deter potential criminals from committing severe offenses. Proponents argue that the fear of facing the ultimate punishment may dissuade individuals from committing violent crimes, thereby promoting public safety and reducing crime rates.
Conclusion
The death penalty remains a contentious issue with valid moral and practical arguments on both sides. While some argue that it is a necessary and just punishment for the most severe crimes, others contend that it is morally wrong and has numerous practical drawbacks.
Given the lack of conclusive evidence supporting the death penalty as an effective deterrent to crime and the potential for wrongful convictions, it is worth considering the abolition of this punishment. Instead, alternative forms of punishment, such as life imprisonment without parole, could be employed to ensure that justice is served while minimizing the risks associated with capital punishment.
Ultimately, the decision to abolish the death penalty should be based on a careful examination of the moral and practical arguments, with the goal of creating a just and humane society that upholds the rights and dignity of all its citizens.
- Revised LNAT 2026 Edition: Fully updated material.
- 200 Full-Length Practice Tests.
- 8,400 Multiple-Choice Questions: Extensive question bank.
- 90 Essay Questions: Includes model answers for guidance.
- 100 Level 1 Tests : Build confidence and baseline scores.
- 100 Level 2 Tests : More verbose and challenging.
- Detailed Explanations for every answer.
- Enhanced Practice: Retake all tests up to two times.
- Answer Shuffling: Randomized for better practice.
- Access Duration: 6 months from the date of purchase.
- Value: Affordable, student-friendly pricing.
- Try two free full length practice tests before you buy.
