LNAT Practice Test Essay – Should governments prioritize space exploration over addressing pressing issues on Earth? Explain your stance.

In the LawMint LNAT Practice Test Series for 2024 and 2025, there are 30 full length tests, with 360 passages – 1260 MCQs and 90 essay prompts or essay questions.

The essay below is a sample that can be written for the prompt:

Should governments prioritize space exploration over addressing pressing issues on Earth? Explain your stance.

This LNAT essay question is included in LawMint LNAT Practice Test series.

While the model essays may include both sides of an argument, the question may require you to state your stance - either for or against; and support it with arguments.

Read our articles and watch the videos on our YouTube channel for guidance on how to structure and write the LNAT Essay.

Introduction

Governments worldwide face the challenge of allocating limited resources to address a multitude of pressing issues. Among these issues is space exploration, which has captured the human imagination for decades and has the potential to unlock new scientific discoveries and technological advancements. However, many argue that focusing on space exploration diverts resources away from more immediate concerns on Earth, such as poverty, climate change, and public health. This essay will discuss the arguments for and against prioritizing space exploration over addressing pressing issues on Earth and explain the author’s stance on the matter.

Arguments in Favor of Prioritizing Space Exploration

Proponents of prioritizing space exploration argue that the potential benefits of investing in this field are immense and could contribute to addressing some of the most pressing issues on Earth. For example, research and technological developments stemming from space exploration have led to advancements in areas such as telecommunications, medical technology, and renewable energy. By continuing to invest in space exploration, governments can foster innovation and create new technologies that may help solve critical problems on Earth.

Additionally, supporters of space exploration contend that it can serve as a catalyst for international cooperation and diplomacy. Collaborative space missions, such as the International Space Station, have demonstrated the potential for countries to work together towards common goals in the name of scientific discovery and human achievement. By prioritizing space exploration, governments can encourage collaboration and strengthen diplomatic ties with other nations.

Finally, proponents argue that space exploration can inspire future generations and promote interest in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. By investing in space exploration and promoting the achievements of space agencies, governments can inspire young people to pursue careers in STEM and contribute to the development of a more knowledgeable and skilled workforce.

Arguments Against Prioritizing Space Exploration

Critics of prioritizing space exploration argue that governments should focus on addressing the immediate needs of their citizens before allocating resources to exploring the cosmos. Issues such as poverty, climate change, and public health have far-reaching consequences that impact the daily lives of millions of people. By diverting resources away from these pressing issues, governments may be exacerbating existing problems and neglecting their responsibility to promote the welfare of their citizens.

Another argument against prioritizing space exploration is the financial burden it places on governments. Space exploration is a costly endeavor, with missions often requiring billions of dollars in funding. Critics argue that these resources could be better spent on improving infrastructure, education, and healthcare systems on Earth.

The Author’s Stance

While the author recognizes the potential benefits of space exploration, the stance taken in this essay is that governments should prioritize addressing pressing issues on Earth. While space exploration can lead to scientific advancements and inspire future generations, governments have a responsibility to allocate resources to the most urgent problems faced by their citizens.

This is not to say that space exploration should be abandoned altogether. Rather, governments should strive to strike a balance between investing in space exploration and addressing pressing issues on Earth. This could involve collaborating with other nations on space missions to share the financial burden and pooling resources to address global problems such as climate change and poverty.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while space exploration has the potential to yield significant scientific discoveries and technological advancements, governments should prioritize addressing the pressing issues faced by their citizens on Earth. By working together to allocate resources effectively and addressing global problems collaboratively, governments can promote the welfare of their citizens and contribute to the betterment of society as a whole. This balanced approach to resource allocation and problem-solving will ensure that the benefits of space exploration can be enjoyed without neglecting the urgent needs of those living on our planet.