LNAT Practice Test Essay – Are universal background checks for gun purchases an effective way to reduce gun violence? Explain your viewpoint.

In the LawMint LNAT Practice Test Series for 2024 and 2025, there are 30 full length tests, with 360 passages – 1260 MCQs and 90 essay prompts or essay questions.

The essay below is a sample that can be written for the prompt:

Are universal background checks for gun purchases an effective way to reduce gun violence? Explain your viewpoint.

This LNAT essay question is included in LawMint LNAT Practice Test series.

While the model essays may include both sides of an argument, the question may require you to state your stance - either for or against; and support it with arguments.

Read our articles and watch the videos on our YouTube channel for guidance on how to structure and write the LNAT Essay.

Introduction

Gun violence remains a pervasive issue in many countries, particularly in the United States, where firearms are both culturally significant and constitutionally protected. In an effort to reduce gun violence, there have been calls for the implementation of universal background checks for all gun purchases. This essay will explore the potential effectiveness of universal background checks in reducing gun violence, as well as the potential drawbacks and limitations of such a policy.

Arguments in Favor of Universal Background Checks

Proponents of universal background checks argue that they are an effective way to reduce gun violence by ensuring that firearms do not fall into the hands of individuals who are at a higher risk of committing violent acts. Currently, many countries, including the United States, have background check systems in place for gun purchases from licensed dealers. However, these systems often do not cover private sales or sales at gun shows, which can account for a significant portion of gun transactions. By closing this loophole, universal background checks could help prevent firearms from being sold to individuals with a history of violent crime or severe mental illness.

Additionally, supporters of universal background checks argue that they can deter so-called “straw purchases,” in which an individual purchases a firearm on behalf of someone who is prohibited from owning one. By requiring background checks for all gun sales, individuals engaged in straw purchases would face a higher risk of being caught and prosecuted, thus reducing the likelihood of such transactions occurring.

Finally, proponents of universal background checks contend that they can help law enforcement trace firearms used in crimes. When all gun sales are subject to background checks, there is a clear record of each transaction, making it easier for law enforcement to track firearms and investigate gun-related crimes.

Arguments Against Universal Background Checks

Critics of universal background checks argue that they may not be as effective in reducing gun violence as proponents suggest. One of the primary concerns is that individuals who are determined to obtain a firearm may still do so through illegal channels, such as the black market or theft. In this case, universal background checks would have little impact on preventing these individuals from acquiring guns.

Another argument against universal background checks is that they may infringe upon individual privacy and the right to bear arms. Opponents argue that background checks can be overly intrusive and may deter law-abiding citizens from purchasing firearms for fear of being placed on a government watchlist or having their personal information compromised.

Furthermore, critics contend that implementing universal background checks can be a logistical and financial burden on both the government and private sellers. Ensuring that all gun sales are subject to background checks requires significant resources, including the development and maintenance of a comprehensive database and the manpower needed to process background checks in a timely manner.

The Author’s Viewpoint

While universal background checks may not be a perfect solution to reducing gun violence, they can be an effective tool in mitigating the risk of firearms falling into the hands of individuals who are more likely to commit violent acts. By closing loopholes in existing background check systems and deterring straw purchases, universal background checks can help prevent some instances of gun violence.

It is essential to recognize that universal background checks alone are not sufficient to address the issue of gun violence. Comprehensive strategies, including education and training for gun owners, mental health support and intervention, and stronger penalties for individuals who engage in illegal firearm transactions, are also crucial in reducing gun violence.

In conclusion, while there are valid concerns about the limitations and potential drawbacks of universal background checks, they can be an effective component of a broader strategy to reduce gun violence. By ensuring that firearms are less likely to be sold to individuals with a history of violent crime or severe mental illness, universal background checks can contribute to creating a safer society for all.