Understanding historical LNAT statistics can help contextualize your own practice scores and set realistic targets for your university application.
The LNAT consortium releases average score data annually. Here is a breakdown of the statistics, what they mean, and how you should adjust your preparation strategy.
Global Average LNAT Scores (Out of 42)
The average LNAT score fluctuates year-over-year depending on the difficulty of the paper. Below is a table of historical averages:
| Testing Cycle | Global Average Score |
|---|---|
| 2024 / 2025 | ~ 21.5 |
| 2023 / 2024 | 22.1 |
| 2022 / 2023 | 20.8 |
| 2021 / 2022 | 21.3 |
What Score Do You Need for Top Universities?
The “Global Average” includes all test takers, many of whom may not gain admission to top-tier universities. If you are applying to highly competitive Russell Group universities (Oxford, Cambridge, UCL, LSE, KCL), the average score of accepted applicants is significantly higher.
| University Tier | Target Score Range |
|---|---|
| Oxford / Cambridge | 27 - 32+ |
| UCL / LSE | 25 - 28+ |
| Bristol / Durham / KCL | 23 - 26+ |
| Other LNAT Universities | 21 - 24+ |
The Preparation Gap
Data suggests that candidates who rely solely on the two free official sample papers tend to score closer to the global average (approx. 21).
To push into the 27+ range required by Oxbridge, candidates need exposure to a wider variety of texts and logic traps. This is where volume preparation becomes statistically significant.
LawMint provides 200 Full-Length LNAT Practice Tests for £50. Taking timed, full-length simulations is the most mathematically robust way to identify your weak areas, track your score progression over time, and ensure you perform in the top 10% on test day.