LNAT Practice Test Essay – University admissions should be based solely on merit. Do you agree or disagree?

In the LawMint LNAT Practice Test Series for 2024 and 2025, there are 30 full length tests, with 360 passages – 1260 MCQs and 90 essay prompts or essay questions.

The essay below is a sample that can be written for the prompt:

University admissions should be based solely on merit. Do you agree or disagree?

This LNAT essay question is included in LawMint LNAT Practice Test series.

While the model essays may include both sides of an argument, the question may require you to state your stance - either for or against; and support it with arguments.

Read our articles and watch the videos on our YouTube channel for guidance on how to structure and write the LNAT Essay.

Introduction

The debate surrounding university admissions criteria often centers around the question of whether admissions should be based solely on merit, or if other factors should be taken into consideration. Advocates for merit-based admissions argue that it ensures a fair and equitable process, while opponents contend that it fails to account for systemic inequalities and other valuable aspects of a student’s background. This essay will discuss the arguments for and against merit-based university admissions, as well as explore alternative approaches to achieve both fairness and diversity in higher education.

Arguments for Merit-Based Admissions

Proponents of merit-based admissions argue that using academic achievement and test scores as the primary criteria for university admissions ensures a fair and objective process. By focusing on quantifiable measures of success, merit-based admissions reward hard work and academic prowess, which are critical factors in determining a student’s potential for success in higher education.

Additionally, supporters of merit-based admissions contend that it fosters a competitive academic environment, encouraging students to excel in their studies and strive for top academic performance. This competition, they argue, can drive overall educational quality and better prepare students for the challenges they will face in their careers and beyond.

Arguments Against Merit-Based Admissions

Critics of merit-based admissions argue that it fails to account for systemic inequalities that disproportionately affect students from marginalized backgrounds. Factors such as access to quality education, family income, and resources can impact a student’s academic performance, leading to an unfair advantage for those with greater access to opportunities.

Opponents also argue that merit-based admissions overlook the importance of diversity in higher education. By focusing solely on academic achievement, universities may fail to attract a diverse student body, limiting the exchange of ideas and perspectives that can enrich the educational experience. Moreover, they contend that other factors, such as leadership skills, community involvement, and unique talents, should be taken into consideration, as they can also contribute to a student’s success in university and beyond.

Alternative Approaches to University Admissions

Given the limitations of merit-based admissions, several alternative approaches can be considered to ensure a fair and diverse admissions process:

Holistic Admissions: This approach takes into account a range of factors, including academic achievement, extracurricular activities, community involvement, and personal background. By evaluating applicants based on their unique experiences and skills, holistic admissions can promote diversity and provide opportunities for students from various backgrounds.

Socioeconomic-Based Admissions: This approach considers an applicant’s socioeconomic status, in addition to their academic achievement. By acknowledging the impact of systemic inequalities on educational opportunities, socioeconomic-based admissions can help level the playing field for students from marginalized backgrounds.

Lottery-Based Admissions: In this system, applicants who meet a minimum threshold of academic performance are entered into a lottery, with a random selection determining who is admitted. This approach can help to eliminate some of the biases inherent in traditional admissions processes and promote a more diverse student body.

Conclusion

While merit-based university admissions may appear to be a fair and objective process, it fails to account for systemic inequalities and the importance of diversity in higher education. Alternative approaches, such as holistic, socioeconomic-based, or lottery-based admissions, can help to address these concerns and ensure a more equitable and diverse admissions process. By implementing these alternative methods, universities can foster a more inclusive educational environment that values a wide range of perspectives and experiences.