- Revised LNAT 2026 Edition: Fully updated material.
- 200 Full-Length Practice Tests.
- 8,400 Multiple-Choice Questions: Extensive question bank.
- 90 Essay Questions: Includes model answers for guidance.
- 100 Level 1 Tests : Build confidence and baseline scores.
- 100 Level 2 Tests : More verbose and challenging.
- Detailed Explanations for every answer.
- Enhanced Practice: Retake all tests up to two times.
- Answer Shuffling: Randomized for better practice.
- Access Duration: 6 months from the date of purchase.
- Value: Affordable, student-friendly pricing.
- Try two free full length practice tests before you buy.
In the LawMint LNAT Practice Test Series for 2025 and 2026, there are 30 full length tests, with 360 passages – 1260 MCQs and 90 essay prompts or essay questions.
The essay below is a sample that can be written for the prompt:
Should mandatory military service be implemented in all countries? Discuss the pros and cons.
Introduction
Mandatory military service, also known as conscription, is a policy that requires citizens of a certain age to serve in the military for a designated period. While some countries, such as Israel, South Korea, and Singapore, have implemented mandatory military service, others have either abolished it or maintain a volunteer-based military force. This essay will discuss the pros and cons of implementing mandatory military service in all countries and consider the implications of such a policy on a global scale.
Pros of Mandatory Military Service
One of the most cited benefits of mandatory military service is the potential for increased national security. With a larger and more diverse pool of military personnel, countries can be better prepared to respond to external threats and maintain a strong defense. Additionally, conscription can help ensure that military forces have a continuous supply of well-trained soldiers, thereby enhancing the overall effectiveness and readiness of the armed forces.
Mandatory military service can also foster a sense of unity and shared responsibility among citizens. By requiring individuals from various backgrounds to serve together, conscription can help break down social barriers and promote a shared sense of national identity. This can contribute to increased social cohesion and a more inclusive society.
Furthermore, proponents of mandatory military service argue that it can provide valuable life skills and personal development opportunities for young people. Military training often involves learning discipline, teamwork, leadership, and problem-solving skills, which can be beneficial in various aspects of life, including education and employment.
Cons of Mandatory Military Service
Opponents of mandatory military service argue that it infringes upon individual freedom and autonomy. Requiring citizens to serve in the military can be viewed as a violation of their personal rights, particularly if they have moral, religious, or philosophical objections to participating in armed conflict.
Another concern related to mandatory military service is the potential for increased government control and militarization of society. By requiring citizens to serve in the military, governments may be more inclined to resort to military force to address conflicts or assert their influence on the international stage. This could contribute to a more militarized global climate, with potentially negative consequences for peace and stability.
Furthermore, critics argue that mandatory military service can be economically inefficient. The cost of training and maintaining a conscripted military force can be high, particularly when factoring in the lost productivity of individuals who would otherwise be engaged in civilian work. In some cases, a professional, volunteer-based military force may be more cost-effective and better suited to address modern security challenges.
Implications of Implementing Mandatory Military Service Globally
The implementation of mandatory military service in all countries would have significant global implications. On the one hand, it could lead to increased military preparedness and cooperation among nations, potentially enhancing global security. On the other hand, it could contribute to a more militarized international climate and exacerbate existing tensions and conflicts.
To determine the appropriateness of implementing mandatory military service on a global scale, it is essential to consider the unique context of each country. Factors such as national security threats, socio-political dynamics, and economic conditions should be taken into account when assessing the merits of conscription.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the question of whether mandatory military service should be implemented in all countries is a complex and multifaceted issue. While there are potential benefits associated with conscription, such as increased national security and social cohesion, there are also significant concerns related to individual freedom, militarization, and economic efficiency. Ultimately, the decision to implement mandatory military service should be based on a careful assessment of the unique circumstances and needs of each country, as well as the potential global implications of such a policy.
- Revised LNAT 2026 Edition: Fully updated material.
- 200 Full-Length Practice Tests.
- 8,400 Multiple-Choice Questions: Extensive question bank.
- 90 Essay Questions: Includes model answers for guidance.
- 100 Level 1 Tests : Build confidence and baseline scores.
- 100 Level 2 Tests : More verbose and challenging.
- Detailed Explanations for every answer.
- Enhanced Practice: Retake all tests up to two times.
- Answer Shuffling: Randomized for better practice.
- Access Duration: 6 months from the date of purchase.
- Value: Affordable, student-friendly pricing.
- Try two free full length practice tests before you buy.
